What Happens at a Clerk-Magistrate Hearing?

For many people accused of a crime in Massachusetts, a Clerk-Magistrate hearing represents the first—and potentially the last—stage of the criminal process. Unlike an arraignment, the hearing takes place before a criminal complaint has issued. This distinction is important. If you are successful at the hearing, you may be able to avoid having a criminal case appear on your record at all.

There are essentially two ways to win a Clerk-Magistrate hearing.

The first is straightforward: the Clerk-Magistrate can find that the allegations are not supported by probable cause and decline to issue the criminal complaint.

The second is less obvious, but often just as important. The Clerk can find that probable cause exists but exercise discretion not to issue the complaint anyway. Understanding the difference between these two outcomes—and preparing for both—is an important part of effectively handling a Clerk-Magistrate hearing.

What Actually Happens at the Hearing?

Clerk-Magistrate hearings are considerably less formal than courtroom proceedings. Typically, you will be in a hearing room with your attorney, a Clerk-Magistrate or Assistant Clerk-Magistrate, and a representative of the police department. The police representative is often not the officer who investigated the incident.

The hearing can be thought of as having two parts.

The first part concerns the allegations themselves. The police representative will typically read the police report into the record, and that report constitutes the Commonwealth’s evidence. Although the police can present additional evidence, in my experience it is extremely rare for the Commonwealth’s presentation to go significantly beyond the police report.

The accused also has an opportunity to present evidence. Depending on the case, that may include photographs, videos, affidavits, documents, or live testimony from witnesses. Your attorney can also identify weaknesses in the allegations and argue that the evidence fails to establish probable cause for one or more of the proposed charges.

If the Clerk agrees, the matter ends there. No criminal complaint issues.

But a finding of probable cause does not necessarily mean that a criminal complaint will issue.

The Clerk’s Discretion

This is effectively the second part of the hearing, and in many cases it is the most important one.

Even if the Clerk finds probable cause, your attorney can ask the Clerk to exercise discretion and decline to issue the complaint. At this point, the focus shifts away from the narrow question of whether a crime probably occurred and toward the much broader question of whether putting this particular person through the criminal justice system actually serves a useful purpose.

This is where a good presentation of the person behind the police report matters.

Employment, education, family support, community involvement, lack of prior criminal history, therapy or treatment, professional consequences, and other evidence of stability can all become important. The circumstances of the incident matter as well. The objective is to give the Clerk a reason to conclude that the potential damage caused by prosecution outweighs whatever public-safety interest would be served by formally bringing the case into court.

In appropriate cases, the Clerk may decide to “put the application out” for a period of time—often approximately six months—rather than issue the complaint immediately.

That decision may come with conditions. The most common is simply that the person remain out of trouble and not pick up any new criminal charges. Depending on the allegations, however, the Clerk may also require restitution, impose a stay-away or no-contact condition, request a letter of apology, or impose another reasonable requirement intended to address the underlying incident.

If the person complies with those conditions during the designated period, the application is dismissed without a criminal complaint ever issuing. As I once heard a Clerk-Magistrate rather colorfully describe the process, the application is eventually “put through the shredder.”

Why Winning the Hearing Matters

The importance of a Clerk-Magistrate hearing is not simply that it can prevent you from having to return to court.

It can prevent the criminal case from being created in the first place.

In Massachusetts, a permanent court record of the criminal case is created when a criminal complaint issues and the defendant is arraigned. By successfully resolving the matter at the Clerk-Magistrate stage, you avoid arraignment and the corresponding entry on your CORI.

From the perspective of your criminal record, the practical result is that the prosecution never happened.

This can be particularly important for people whose careers, professional licenses, education, immigration circumstances, or reputations could be affected by the existence of a criminal case—even one that might ultimately be dismissed.

It is also why a Clerk-Magistrate hearing should not be treated simply as an informal preliminary appearance. It is a genuine opportunity to end a case before it begins.

Preparing for Both Ways to Win

A strong Clerk-Magistrate presentation should generally be prepared on two tracks.

First, your attorney should examine the evidence and determine whether the proposed charges are actually supported by probable cause. Police reports are not infallible, and the legal elements of a crime do not always match the way an incident is characterized in a report.

But preparation should not end there.

Your attorney should also be prepared to explain why, even assuming probable cause exists, issuing a criminal complaint is unnecessary. That may mean gathering employment or educational records, evidence of community involvement, treatment records where appropriate, letters of support, proof of restitution, or other information that places the allegations in the context of the person’s life as a whole.

The distinction is important. The first argument is that the Commonwealth does not have enough evidence to bring the charge. The second is that even if it does, bringing the charge would accomplish little while potentially causing substantial and unnecessary harm.

Either argument can prevent the issuance of a criminal complaint. And either can mean walking out of the courthouse without a criminal case ever appearing on your record.

‍